JUDGES CONFLICT OF INTEREST: PENSIONS ARE IN MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES

Received this uncorroborated report. I checked with some sources who thought it was true. Anyone with information please write back in

This is just some quick search info on Maricopa County pensions.

No wonder the judges and cops will break any law to help the banks. 2
years ago they had $680 million in their retirement, now they have
$260 million. They know if the banks lose there will be nothing left
for them. The pensions were so vested in real estate mortgages, both
US and foreign, the pension fund is going down almost twice as fast as
the rest of us.

They are backed in a corner and must either rip us off or go broke.

The attached documents just scratch the surface of what we need to
discover. Once we can verify the judge is writing orders in violation
of stae law AND protects his investment, we have sufficient grounds
for Qui Tam, Whistle blower, RICO and HOBBS on the judges.~ John
Stuart

Here are some websites that correspond to the attachments

http://www.cafrman.com/Articles/Art-MaricopaCounty-AZ-C1.htm

http://www.maricopa.gov/Internal_audit/PubDocuments/FY2009/FinconFY09.pdf

http://cafr1.com

https://www.azasrs.gov/web/Investments.do

https://www.azasrs.gov/content/pdf/financials/20091218_REI_Report.pdf

https://www.azasrs.gov/content/pdf/financials/20091218_PEI_Report.pdf

http://www.psprs.com

http://www.psprs.com/Admin_Investments_and_Finance/cato_financial_volitility.htm

60 Responses

  1. Here is a post on Illinois AG Madigan’s website, where she called a National Mortgage Settlement was FORGED. I am wondering why?

    http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2014_07/20140714.html

    Attorney General Lisa Madigan in announced an $84 million settlement with Citigroup as a result of the bank’s misconduct in its marketing and sale of risky residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) leading up to the 2008 economic collapse.

    The agreement is part of a national settlement forged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and also joined by attorneys general from California, Delaware, Massachusetts and New York. The settlement includes $44 million in relief to fully recover for losses incurred by Illinois’ pension systems and $40 million in consumer relief.

    The settlement requires Citigroup to pay a total of $44 million to the Illinois Teachers Retirement System, the State Universities Retirement System, and the Illinois State Board of Investment, which oversees the State Employees’ Retirement System, General Assembly Retirement System and Judges’ Retirement System.

    Like

  2. DyingTruth… An 80 year old couple was just foreclosed upon last Friday. Anything you could post regarding the conflict of issue for Kansas would be greatly appreciated. I’m helping the write a en banc rehearing and time is of the essence. Can you e-mail me directly & post in here ? My address is sky757pilot@yahoo.com. Thanks

    Like

  3. dying truth –

    You are absolutely right.The Credit River case articulates the money fraud perpetrated by most of the banks in complete disregard to our US Constitution.

    When I filed my Federal Petition in 1997 I didn’t have nor know how to use a computer. I sat in the library for endless hours searching and finding Ultra Vires cases decided by the US Supreme Court on the relationship between a mortgage contract and
    Article I Paragraph 10 Clause 1.

    Judge Mahoney was a very brave Judge to uphold our Constitution. What happened in MN in 1968 was supposed to stay their silently but today we have an internet.

    Like

  4. marillynhelyn,
    YOU’RE WELCOME.
    Federal Reserve Act declared void by MN Judge in Credit River decision.
    As to using the “Contitution” as ‘Pro Se’, use it as ‘Sui Juris’ instead and from cited quotations of Federal Court cases as authority. Even though Federal Courts have no common law of their own the will generally respect their superiors. Look for them by keyword search here > http://scholar.google.com/advanced_scholar_search?hl=en&num=100&as_sdt=2003

    Like

  5. if this helps any……https://www.azasrs.gov/content/pdf/minutes/20010817.pdf They have been for years……… since i was a state employee and how sad i just found out by you……ugh

    Like

  6. Dying Truth
    Thanks for giving me information on the New York website.

    Back in 1997 , after the Bank had hid four of my mortgage checks, with impute from a wonderful bankruptcy judge the Hon. Cornelius Blackshear,
    I filed a secus Federal Petition upon Federal Question ruling on
    1 The newly discovered evidence that Fidelity NY FSB created money in direct prohibition to Article 1, Para 10 ,Clause 1 of the United States Constitution

    2.The Federal Statute of 30 day notice.

    The Hon Louis L Stanton of US District Court
    Southern District read it, and sent me to the Federal Clerk to pay my$150 filing fee. I Demanded a Jury Trial and Annexed the Record. I was given my docket number and the next day I filed a copy of the Petition in the County clerk office of NY. The case was removed.

    Approximately a month later the Hon LL Stanton issued his first order setting conference purs. to
    Rule 16 (b) and directed that I make a money demand settlement upon the bank.

    Approximately three months into the Federal Case the Attorneys Mullooly Jeffrey Rooney & Flynn either conned or scared Judge Stanton into remanding this Federal Questions case saying it was frivolous and who can create money is not subject matter for the Federal Court..

    That only the Federal Government could create Money is the reason that we changed from the Articles of Confederation to the US Constitution,

    it is hard enough being pro se in the court, but don’t mention the word “Constitution”

    Like

  7. BSE,
    Thanks for responding, and doing so honestly. Also as I said to you before (I think), if you know a judge in Florida, please try to explain to him/her that all of this fraud is being used to cover up the even bigger fraud, which is not where the money is going but where all the “money” for mortgages came from. A MN found out, declared it and the Laws which allowed it, all a fraud and void. He unfortunately payed for that decision with his life, but we should not let him die in vein.

    Like

  8. Dying Truth.

    Not a judge and not in position at this time to disclose
    all details. Just some facts, Take it for what it is worth.

    Like

  9. Gary H,
    Just a bankrupt bank trying to make its own laws (as if it could), and act as though they can be used as valid authority in court (which they cannot). They are not the UCC and their internal policies do not affect or amend the UCC in any way, shape or form, nor does it make any of their or any servicer’s actions lawful or legitimate. Quite the opposite, by doing all this run around and claiming it to be in valid compliance with the Law when they originally could and should have done it as prescribed by Law, they are implying their own guilt and showing that they’re completely trying to avoid taking any at all. When if it were by law justifiable their name would be stated on the back of each note as the endorsee when the endorser signed it or a complete chain of assignments linking the 2 together. The reason there is not is to avoid any and all liability when the $#!T hits the fan.

    Like

  10. Sorry everyone don’t mean to be off-topic but has anyone seen this…..?

    https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/annltrs/pdf/2008/0812.pdf

    Temporary transfer of a Note to a servicer???

    Like

  11. The Judge should offer to recuse himherself before trial. Or ask both parties if they object to himher presiding over the case.

    Instead they treat us like little kids. Karma is a bitch.

    The robo Superior Court Judges need to tried in international Courts and charged with Crimes against humanity They are no different than Charles Manson Iddi Amin Dadda or Milosovic.

    NEVER AGAIN

    Like

  12. Deb wynn,
    No, Judge Shack is not faking it. He’s just done the actual research and has come to the inevitably, logically ultimate conclusion (the same of which, all judges should), that when it’s all said and done, all of their pensions will be worthless, no matter how many foreclosures happen. Because 1) the MBS aren’t backed or secured by any real or monetary assets (No Notes). 2) they don’t control how and where the money goes and who it goes to after the homes are re-sold for profit (the money does not go directly to their pensions after any sale, it’s all “handled” by the bank owned servicers who intentionally keep shorting them just to get them even more pissed off at homeowners).

    Do you kinda see how it works now?

    Like

  13. E. Tolle,
    Have I not been saying this for the longest time? Why did nobody listen to me before? I don’t and never did care about credit for it, but I’ve BEEN trying to get this issue out into the public and nobody ever even thought twice about it.

    Like

  14. BSE,
    What do you mean “you faced recusal”?

    If you’re a Judge (name unnecessary), speak up so we can at least address and discuss these issues directly like adults, instead of avoiding them as if they don’t exist.

    Like

  15. Read this piece on Sachs and scratch your heads as to why this group of whores ever got a penny from our tax monies. And then ask yourself again why they’re not all sitting in small rooms with metal cots.

    All this after researching my state’s judicial pension fund only to find the SOB’s Sachs near the top. Chase, Blackrock…..all the other inglorious basterds right in there with them. This HAS to be called out in public.

    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/how-goldman-killed-a-i-g-and-other-stories/

    Like

  16. Dying Truth why do you call me names? that is not nice. I do not have a plan I am watching things unfold. This is all too big for me. Why you call me racist? Inhumane Prick? That is really not nice. I love all people of this earth. Even You.

    I was just asking you a simple question?

    We are moving into your neighborhood

    NEVER AGAIN DONT PLAY THE FOOL

    Like

  17. FYI – I faced recusal 3 times with the same case.
    Sometimes it is used as a stall tactic
    .

    Like

  18. So is judge shack faking it?

    Like

  19. THE A MAN,
    You truely are just a simple, ignorant creature. This was not a “newly found link”, Abby from CA and I have pointed this out many times before. And in case you can’t figure it out yourself (obviously the case), if Judges’ pensions are all stuffed with MBS chances are recusal won’t necessarily do you any good because all Judges’ pensions are pooled in the same fund together, so you’re still going to end up with a Judge pissed off that s/he’s not getting the expected return on MBS from homeowners being charged usurious (illegal) interest rates. I never said anything about recusal, because I know that it’s not an isolated issue they all have it.

    But how about your proposed “plan”?

    “THE A MAN, on February 19, 2011 at 8:30 am said:
    YOU JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS ARE GONNA GET WHAT COWARDS DESERVE. LOSS OF PENSION AND PROBABLY LOSS OF JOBS OR BETTER YET PAY CUTS. AND DONT BLAME ME THE MESSENGER. BLAME YOURSELVES FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE LAWS.

    BE STRONG AND COURAGEOUS.

    THE A MAN, on February 19, 2011 at 8:26 am said:
    SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES YOU COWARDS THAT INCLUDES YOU.”

    So please, I would love to see you “MAN” UP on that one and let all of us know how well that “plan” worked out. Other than that in case my last message was too subtle >

    DON’T EVEN BOTHER SPEAKING TO ME YOU INHUMANE, RACIST PRICK.

    Like

  20. Dying Truth Okay Recuse. Ask your judge to recuse himself with your newly found link. Lets see how far you get. I am dying to hear the news.

    NEVER AGAIN.

    Like

  21. THE A MAN,
    First of all it’s “recuse” and second don’t even bother speaking to me, okay. If Neil doesn’t want to apologize, fine. But, I don’t need any of his little lackies giving me whatever supremacy crap you guys are trumped up on.

    Like

  22. I’d say hail Mary if I were catholic. Conflict of interest indeed and tough, time these judges did the honorable thing ( but they will not please font hold your breath)

    Like

  23. Neil’s being a hater again, I posted New York and what I believe is the one for Virginia but Neil’s moderating the comment, and he still hasn’t apologized.

    Like

  24. Dying Truth What do you want from Neil Garfield. Ask your judge to recluse himself. Let’s see how far you get.

    NEVER AGAIN

    Like

  25. So are any of you gonna ask the judge to recluse him her self?

    Like

  26. The issue is not the reduction in size of pension funding — which exists — the issue is conflict of interest in judicial deciding of any foreclosure case that claims a connection to MBS – directly connected to judicial retirement funding. Any other case would be automatic recusal by judge. But, judges decide foreclosure before any disclosures are made. And, judges investment disclosure is poorly reported to start with — as required by law.

    Of course, government did not help – via TARP – where MBS remnants were transferred from banks to the US Government — who subsequently, transfers to another party. And, of course, that party is deregulated.

    Let’s start with Blackrock. .

    Like

  27. For anyone searching for Judicial Retirement System in Virginia, that’s the title; it’s a sub-head under Virginia Retirement System/VRS. Based on local news reports the VRS took a major hit from both FX International Currency Traders at BONY and MBSs in their fund.
    Stated as a 25% reduction in overall assets. They’re now considering requiring current state employees to contribute to their own pensions. Prior to this, the retirement was totally funded by the state.

    Like

  28. How about Georgia, Cobb County, and U.S.D.C. GA. NORTHERN DIVISION

    Like

  29. I knew there was something behind all these worthless pieces of living s*** judges…They should all choke on a piece of chicken. Take it to the streets people….

    Like

  30. Found this:

    Capital Land
    LOCAL NEWS BY EXAMINER STAFF
    Cuccinelli intervenes in pension fraud suit

    By: David Sherfinski 01/28/11 3:05 PM
    Examiner Staff Writer
    Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has intervened in a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower against a New York bank that oversees Virginia’s pension fund.
    The lawsuit seeks $150 million in damages from the Bank of New York Mellon, the Washington Post reported. It charges that traders skimmed profits on transactions related to the Virginia Retirement System, as well as the pension funds of Fairfax and Arlington counties.

    The suit, filed under the state’s Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, was first filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court in 2009 and recently unsealed. A spokesman for the bank told the Post the lawsuit lacked merit.

    Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/capital-land/2011/01/cuccinelli-intervenes-pension-fraud-suit?quicktabs_1=2#ixzz1ERR8ktVj

    Like

  31. @Dying Truth: Please post the link for Virginia. I’ll be eternally grateful. Good work, by the way.

    Like

  32. “Dying Truth”
    Do you have the website for New York State Judges?
    Thanks.

    Like

  33. On February 10th, in your Take the Money and then take the House” I posted reference to an e mail I received about “Judges have a vested Interest in you Losing.”

    BSE wanted me to post the whole email but
    I only posted the message in part since I was not able to forward it to Livinglies@WordPress.com
    (It kept coming back with the postmaster saying -delivery failed the reason saying”Remote SMTP server has rejected address.”

    So here is the rest of the heading and e mail:

    To Michael Edwards -yourremedyisinthelaw.com

    ME: Thought you might like to read this. Pass it on to the Florida folks. Better to be in Joinder in California then rely on Florida Judges.

    Neil I hope this source is what you are looking for.

    Neil you are really helping us all pull it together. If you could only post what we could do when a Judge
    like Judge Alice Schlesinger takes a bribe after a bank admits its mistake and states it’s indemnify
    indemnify indemnify – we are stepping aside and the title companys are stepping in and in steps corrupt attorneys from Fidelity National Title and Coronet Title who insured the forged deeds and states “we have Equity” and Judge Schlesinger rules against the Law, and the Supremacy clause of the Constitution.

    Like

  34. In California CALPERS is the pension fund for government employees, which of course includes judges. If you google

    calpers 2010 annual report

    it’ll take you to a PDF for CALPERS. If you search for the word “securitized” you’ll see that the pension fund invests in securitized trusts and distressed securities.

    BTW, this is not unusual. Furthermore, CALPERS members probably don’t know the exact makeup of the pension fund assets because it changes all the time. All the members care about is getting a decent return on investment.

    The fact that the pension fund holds securitized trust assets wouldn’t really impact a government servant like a judge as far as the pensions holdings because there aren’t enough securitized trusts in there to make much of a difference in the grand scheme of things.

    Judges rule the way they do because nobody wants to be the “crazy judge” who opened the floodgates. This is particularly true of California, especially since it’s a nonjudicial foreclosure state. In UD proceedings the commissioner (not a real judge) and plaintiff’s counsel are typically dim light bulbs. They don’t put a lot of effort or thought into what they do; they just want to make their money and go home each day.

    How do I know this? Personal experience as a Pro Se, 30 years legal training (paralegal), and insight from at least a dozen CA lawyers.

    You can’t win in UD court. What you need to do is sue all parties who ever touched the loan and file a quiet title suit. Keep it narrow and focused because if you throw in everything but the kitchen sink, it muddies the waters and defeats the purpose because judges want to deal with simple, straightforward proceedings and the more focused it is, the more likely you may prevail.

    Sure, everyone wants their day in court to give the judge and adverse counsel a tongue lashing to count all the ways in which we’ve been robbed of our property and our constitutional rights. But the reality is that no judge is going to let a Pro Se, let alone a lawyer, filbuster in his/her courtroom. The courtrooms are not like Judge Judy, People’s Court or other TV shows. The reality is much more stark — and dark. In the courtroom there’s black and white and maybe a little bit of gray but not much. The trick is to be as close to black or white as possible; otherwise, chances are the judge will get impatient and rule for whoever has the most convincing — albeit brief and to the point — argument.

    And yes, there is most certainly a prejudice against homeowners, especially Pro Se’s. It’s a fact.

    The reality is harsh, but it’s critical to understand the true lay of the land as it really is rather than focus on how we think it is or how we want it to be. The victories we read about are most certainly laudable and make us want to rejoice and keep our hopes up. The reality is those victories are a very small percentage of the entire whole.

    I’m a fighter. I’m still fighting and have been for several years. But I’ve learned the hard way that we have to fight fire with fire, and the best way to do that is, if you don’t have a lawyer, do whatever you can to drag it out for as long as you can and scrape up every penny you have to hire a lawyer as soon as possible. There are some very knowledgeable lawyers out there who are indeed taking on these cases. Please email me if you’d like for me to send you some of my recommendations.

    Peace,
    Carrie

    Like

  35. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Carlos Marroquin, Teri Sherwood. Teri Sherwood said: JUDGES CONFLICT OF INTEREST: PENSIONS ARE IN MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES: http://t.co/hVQpjW5 #Corruption […]

    Like

  36. Neil,
    Here’s a link to the same kind of search for the State of Arizona. You may want to put something together for fellow Arizonians. >

    http://www.google.com/search?q=mortgage+securities+site%3Aasrs.state.az.us&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-us%3AIE-SearchBox&num=30&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=

    Like

  37. mary,
    Click on this link below. It automatically searches the Florida State website for the two keywords: “mortgage” and “securities” in official publications by the State of Florida I will also look to see what I can find, but what we should be looking for is something like multiple statements spread out over the years, showing the overall investments in MBS pensions have and how it has affected the invested expected return (particularly for Judges, they usually have their own fund, well in CA they do).

    But you have to get other people from your state to get involved with it and you can’t just sit on this info. I tried as much as I could trying to show the people over at 4closurefraud the connection between MBS, pensions and the Rocket Docket so make this count. Get it up and running, not only for you but for all Floridians, Okay?

    Here’s the search link I’ll post the good stuff I find on Scribd and post a link >

    http://www.google.com/search?q=mortgage+securities+site%3Amyflorida.com&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-us%3AIE-SearchBox&num=30&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=

    or just put this in your Google search bar >

    mortgage securities site:myflorida.com

    Like

  38. DT, yes, but how do you prove it!!!

    Like

  39. dt
    fight on! ahead of the curve is [not normal]
    normal is slow, apathetic ,cow eyed waiting for the hammer!

    Like

  40. Everyone, there’s a private National Warning Video about the Doom that is Looming over us, that will strike and affect all of us in the near future. >

    http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1011PSIENDVD/OPSIM212/PR

    Viewer discretion is advised.

    Like

  41. dt
    TAKE HEART
    The role of ..‘lone nut’ conspiracy theorist, has been to enlighten &you have done exactly that enlighten!!, i will be the 1st to say you are neither alone,nut, nor-theorist, [all MSM terms to discredit ].
    FIGHT ON BROTHER.

    Like

  42. THE JUDGES IN WISCONSIN ARE RULING IN FAVOR OF THE PROTESTERS.

    A LITTLE TOO LATE SUCKERS. THE BANKSTERS PULLED A FAST ONE ON YOU GUYS.

    SUCKERS.

    Like

  43. Yeah but if they follow the law they would have been saved.

    TO THE JUDGES AND SHERRIFFS AND COPS.

    CRIME DOES NOT PAY.

    NOW YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR PENSIONS SALARIES AND YOUR COMMUNITY.

    SUCKERS.

    Like

  44. EVERYONE, to go along with this CONFLICT OF INTEREST I Neil posted this article back in November 2010 that I wrote.

    Just goto Neils search box and type in:

    65% of Fresno Judges Have MERS on their Own Mortgages.

    If you are in court you need to verify that your judge has a conflict.

    As John Gault says in his response to Neil’s headline SO2+ FABRICATED NOTES OR ON REAL?, you need to write every judge in your jurisdictions and tell them what we expect them to do: FOLLOW THE LAW.

    FOLKS WE WILL WIN THIS BATTLE, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.

    OUR NEXT COURT DATE IS APRIL 7,2011

    HYDROGENE 559 907 7623

    Like

  45. mary,
    It’s right there in front of your face for ALL THE WORLD to see as I’ve pointed out here and over at 4closurefraud, it’s called >

    “THE ROCKET DOCKET”

    Do you really think they came out of retirement because they felt they weren’t doing enough for the community? That whole ‘Rocket Docket’ system is a ‘Foreclosure Mill’ in itself. In terms of RICO it is considered the “criminal enterprise” which is used instrumentally as a conduit for racketeering and extortion.

    Like

  46. Abby in CA,
    Yeah but where have you been? You haven’t even as so much acknowleged our concurrent conclusions, that maybe everyone else including Neil would have picked up on it had you done so and engaged in discussion upon the topic, instead of leaving me looking like some ‘lone nut’ conspiracy theorist.

    Like

  47. It should be very interesting to see what comes after this in the way of rewinding the foreclosures. Sooner or later, this issue of pensions is going to come out. Considering what is going on in Wisconsin at the moment, maybe that will be the route to transparency in pension funds and how it affects foreclosure. Burmese8@yahoo.com

    Like

  48. Neil,
    I demand an apology from you.

    You know darn well that this has been the issue I have been bringing to the forefront because of its severity for a long time now. You, largely ignored, and failed to take heed to the warning of these issues I have repeatedly brought forth.

    Martha Raysik,
    I gave my best answer to that question a while back (though I think only ANONYMOS was paying attention, if any at all).

    I said the most logical would be to resolve the issue of their pensions first and permit whatever recover they need to obtain from the banks first and just stop and toll all of the limitation for all pending and even adjudicated (within a few years) homeowner cases to be retried properly after everything else is settled. For 1) the obvious reason which is why the banks did what they did, because they knew it would affect every Judge’s personal judgment and negatively affect their decisions when using their official judgment. 2) it will allow our Federal and respective State governments and localities to recover and stabilize relieving the mounting pressure of having to deal with caseloads piling up and at the same time ensuring those cases receive the “due process” and justice they’re entitled to at a later more appropriate time, when tranquility is restored.

    Open discussion everyone please. Do not get sidetracked and forget any of this is happening.

    Like

  49. NEIL–I HAVE POSTED DOZENS OF TIME ABOUT THE FEDERAL JUDGES RETIREMENT PLANS BEING MANAGED BY BLACKROCK.

    BLACKROCK ALSO MANAGES ALL THE MAIDEN LANE TOXICS.

    I ONCE POSTED SEVERAL MONTHS AGO THE WEB PAGE PORTAL FOR ONE OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES’ RETIREMENT PLANS.

    BLACKROCK IS ALSO ALL OVER THAT PORTAL.

    Like

  50. How do we verify in the State of Florida?

    Like

  51. OKAY HELLO THERE NEIL!

    How long have I BEEN saying this and pointing it out to you and EVERYONE else here?

    Like

  52. How do we verify in our own state?

    Like

  53. This is a serious issue. How do you ask the judge if “they have any monetary investment in the outcome?” Which of course they must, even if they did not personally buy the stock, they are aware of the pensions being tied in by now.

    How do you do this, without pissing off that judge?

    How do we devise a system to protect the Judges. Of all the pensions out there, these should be bullet proof, so as to ensure a fair judiciary. Sort of like a tenure on their retirement.
    This is a law I would like to see passed.

    Like

  54. And the beat goes on. Big bonuses and salaries for bankers.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41663618/ns/business-consumer_news/

    Like

  55. Call Bill Black to investigate Arizona Builders, Appraisal, Mortgage, & Securities Fraud.
    There are a few Builders, Attornies, Judges and a Senator who belong in jail. Not to mentiones several C.E.Os from within Wells Fargo, BofA and US Bank.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: