TDSF.com website oddly down?

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

COMBO Title and Securitization Search, Report, Documents, Analysis & Commentary GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE

AUCTIONS AND BIDDING ARE AUTOMATED

BY TRUSTEE SURROGATE

Cochrane:

OPPPSSSS – TDSF.com website oddly down? offline ? Hmmmmm. Interesting coincidence

ian – w ‘anyone’ can file a notice of default – blank form on TD Services website:

‘Foreclosure’s Notice of Default’ Foreclosure request screen oddly enough just opens to anyone?

https : // www . tdsf . com / rqsnod . htm

TD Services dba TD Escrow Services,

TD is a partner in a number of networks and a PREMIER provider for several industry providers including MERS.

Look at cover pages provided in Discovery for “TD ”

any DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS look for ‘TD’
All dirty deeds done by the non-judicial state ‘TRUSTEES’ and Sub-stitutue ‘TRUSTEES’ and judicial states robo-firms.

You are about to launch T.D. Service Company’s on-line request to prepare a notice of default.

To initiate a foreclosure proceeding, please complete the request form on the following page. You must then forward copies of the applicable documents (as selected on the form) to our office. If you have any questions please contact our office at (800) 843-0260 and ask for a foreclosure specialist.

By clicking the button below you agree to the following:
I accept sole responsibility for the information provided to T.D. Service Company via this on-line form for the purpose of preparing foreclosure documents. I understand that this web application is proprietary to T.D. Service Company and is used solely for the purpose of initiating foreclosure proceedings. I have also read and understood T.D. Service Company’s privacy policy regarding on-line transactions.

Chart of Document Services Outsource Work Flow, click on image, and save document using internet browser, file, save, TD_Doc_Outsource.jpg
Paste URL and view documents http://www.tdsf.com/graphics/Outsource_flow.jpg

Web-based Lookups, Electronic Reporting screen can be saved as a document “WEB-STAR” Lien Release Search. Click on the image and browser select ‘File’ save as TD_WEBSTAR_Lien_Release.jpg

You’ll find in related documents and discovery, ‘Service#’ and ‘Loan#’ and Borrower Name, State, Payoff Date, Property Address. The Nancy Drew investigators will be looking at the screen image integration

Data inside ‘input screens’ are saved inside databases and those databases used to create checks, wire transfers, falsified DOT’s, DOS,’s, Assignments, Liens, Allonges, Notes, etc

TD preferred provider of MERS, a transaction partner with LPS, and can accept data for many of TD services INCLUDING LIEN RELEASE, ASSIGNMENT, FORECLOSURE, AND MANY OTHER TRANSACTIONS.

TD ‘can send’ data ‘back to TD clients in wide variety of formats including:
XML, hard-copy, txt, csv (spreadsheet default format to import and export data, and others.
SECURE ‘FTP’
web services,
many othe rmethods.
Reports & Billing on-line applications.
On-line applications can interface (integrate) with customers’ in-house systems.

TD partner IBM Business Recocvery Services (BRS).
TD provides hot site aound nation mirror equipment duplicate TD’s operating environment and config.
TD Data Security, as required by HUD, TD fully complaint with Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Financial Moderenzation Act) regarding ‘privacy’ of sensitive data. Consumers don’t realize when they sign credit application on-line or on paper, all bank-affiliates and non-bank affiliates globally have access to their data.

Bruce Gauger, TD’s CIO responsible for TD’s

‘Trustee sale information’
‘lien releases’
‘reconveyance lookup’
‘assignment’
‘document research inquiryt’
‘dedicated FTP’
‘other’

TD owners and benefactors constanting develop applications for their commercial clients who engage in commerce in private licensed communication channels or publically licensed communications channels.

Publishing and posting of Legal Notices, Conducting trustee Sales, Senior Lien bidding

TAC Trustee Assistance Corporation, a subsidiary of TD Service Financial Corp, weblink changed, Cached google not working, text only

Publishing and posting of Legal Notices, Conducting trustee Sales, Senior Lien bidding.

Established in 1985, Trustee’s Assistance Corporation (“TAC”) is a subsidiary of TD Service Financial Corporation. Its primary focus is providing publishing, posting, conducting trustee sales and related support services to the industry.

TAC is headquartered in Santa Ana, California with a branch office in Phoenix, Arizona. TAC offers a broad range of services in the states of Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington including:

Automated Trustee Sale Hot Line:
(714) 480-5690 (24 hours) Web-based Trustee Sale Lookup

Publishing and posting of legal notices.
Conducting trustee sales.
Senior lien bidding.
Connectivity to customer’s servicing systems, electronic transfer of publication data to newspapers.
Messenger service for pickup and delivery of documents.
Property inspections.
Trustee sale/auction information free on web and by telephone (714) 480-5690.

For more information, contact Renee M. Patrick (714) 480-5550

This is Google’s cache of http://www.tdsf.com/tac.htm. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Aug 8, 2011 18:36:42 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Full versionThese search terms are highlighted: td services

About these ads

25 Responses

  1. All About FIS (Portal Update) with FREDDIE & FANNIE &
    GMAC Mortgage & State of Maryland – the pass-thru-agency state.
    TD Services dba TD Escrow Services & TD Services FInancial.
    FNF buying back stock per agreement with FIS 2006.

    https://livinglies.wordpress.com/2011/08/14/all-about-fis/
    Very IMPORTANT

    How could money laundering take place with Patriot Act 9/11/2001? Is this not the most regulated period of our nation’s history? Where was the FinCEN? Oh the OCC bypassed the money laundering protections making Mortgage Servicers EXEMPT! Using OCC new ExtraOrdinary Visitorial Powers 2002 – Supremacy Clause – claiming all bank-affiliates and non-bank affiliates related to RETAIL MORTGAGE SERVICERS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM REPORTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH FinCEN Money Laundering Regulations!

    H E L L O Is this important that during origination the only document you all don’t have is the CASH from the Non-Depository Trust Company?

    Like in 1996 when NASCOR active Trust Co of NY, Non-deposit Trust Company Non-Member would provide cash for Institutional Investors.

    President Obama is not protecting the welfare of the nation. Is not enforcing the laws. Carryover from S&L disaster the economy never did recover and the handling of ‘mortgages’ a big problem under Patriot Act regarding money laundering but if not for the OCC.

    And if not bot for the integrated network/vendor/servicers of FREDDIE MAC, Chase, GMAC, Norwest includes WFC & Microsoft 2000. Home Technologies in 1 year divested into other IPSo’s in which the data processing technologies and pipelines were secured through 1995 1996 Merger Lawyers TItle Corp, Commonwealth, …FIS only approved vendor/servicer of FREDDIE MAC as Originator and includes the long list you’ll find in a recent comment following infor ‘All About FIS’.

    Norwest Corporations’ newly acquired affiliate (joint venture) with GMAC-RFC & Chase Manhattan Mortgage
    directly related to pass thru agency who accepts institutional investors retail cash deposits.

    Norwest Asset Securities Corp ‘NASCOR’ the pass thru agency recorded on SEC the one who orders the REMITTER c/o Institutional Investor/Institutional Bank CASH payable to ‘closing agent’ c/o Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corp, for example? which appears as a pass-thru agency one where 10K’s Annual Reports information are reported ‘elsewhere.’

    Scary – Norwest Corporation 1996 not only owns the joint venture with GMAC-RFC and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp -newly acquired affiliate largest producer non-conforming Alternative Investments, Alt-A Loans, etc.

    Norwest Corporation RSSD ID 1120754 Parent
    3/28/1996 Norwest Asset Securities Corp RSSD ID 2495208
    405 Southwest 5th St, Des Moines IA RENAMED
    4/17/2000 to Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corp

    #1 NORWEST CORP RSSD ID 1120754
    39 -* NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NA 995151 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN NATIONAL BANK
    40 –* NORWEST TRUST COMPANY, NEW YORK 90618 FLOWS TO #39 NEW YOR – NON-DEPOSIT TRUST COMPANY NON-MEMBER
    Leases technology through
    45 –* NORWEST EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC. 1149885 #39 MINNEAPOLIS MN FINANCE CO
    46 —* FIRST INTERSTATE EQUIP FINANCE INC 1087790 MINNEAPOLSI MN DOE TO #45
    48 —* COMMONWEALTH LEASING CORP 2135148 #45 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    69 -* AMERICAN REPUBLIC BANCSHARES, INC 1066517 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN BANK HOLDING CO

    60-* FIDELITY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (1049060) TO #1 PHOENIX AZ (DOE)
    61 -* UNITED BANKS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. TO #1 DENVER CO (DOE)
    199 -* NORWEST INSURANCE INC 1149830 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    200 –* NORWEST INSURANCE WYOMING INC 1051456 TO #199 MINNEAPOLSI MN
    201 –* NORWEST INSURANCE ARIZONA INC 1194371 TO #199 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    202 –* REGENCY INSURANCE AGENCY INC 1848151 TO #199 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    203 –* RURAL COMMUNITYINSURANCE AGENCY INC 1940309 TO #199 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    204 —* CROP HAIL MANAGEMENT 1468090 TO #203 SIOUX FALLS SD
    205 —* NORWEST RURAL INSRUANCE SERVICES INC 2253145 TO #203 SIOUX FALLS SD
    206 –* ATI TITLE AGENCY OF OHIO, INC 2253275 TO #199 CLEVELAND OH
    207 –* DIRECTORS INSURANCE SERVICE 2292117 TO #199 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    208 -* LOWRY ILL INVESTMENET ADVISORS, INC T1153958 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    209 -* NORWEST INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC 1153967 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN
    210 -* MIDWEST CREDIT LOIFE INSURANCE CO 1155644 TO #1 PHOENIX AZ
    211 -* MINNETONKA OVERSEAS INVESTMEENT LTD T1196562 TO #1 GEORGE TOWN CAYMAN
    212 –* MINNETONKA REPRESENTACOES COMMERCIAIS LTDA #211 SAO PAULO BRAZIL 2059963 BRAZIL FOREIGN ENTITY

    69 -* AMERICAN REPUBLIC BANCSHARES, INC 1066517 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN BANK HOLDING CO
    70 –* NORWEST BANK NEW MEXICO, NA 599951 TO #69 ALBURQUERQUE NM NATIONAL BANK
    71 —* RAVEN ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC 2535980 TO #70 NEW CASTLE DE
    72 -* KEN-CARYL INVESTMENT CO 1067578 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN BANK HOLDING CO
    73 –* NORWEST BANK COLORADO, NA 728854 TO #72 DENVER CO NATIONAL BANK
    74 —* LINCOLN BUILDING CORP 1049051 TO #73 DENVER CO (DOE)
    75 —* FREMONT PROPERTIES INC 1494651 TO #73 DENVER CO (DOE)
    76 —* FALCON ASSDET MANAGEMENT INC 2185367 TO #73 NEW CASTLE DE (DOE)
    77 —-* BLUE SPIRIT INSRUANCE CO 1028515 TO #76 BURLINGTON VT (DOE)

    79 -* VICTORIA BANKSHARES INC 102125 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN BANK HOLDING CO
    80 –* VICTORIA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 1927131 TO #79 NEW CASTLE DE BANK HOLDING CO
    81 —* NORWEST BANK TEXAS, SOUTH CENTER 364869 TO #80 VICTORIA TX NON-MEMBER BANK
    82 —-* VICTORIAL CAPITAL CORP 1102134 81 VICTORIA TX (DOE)
    83 —-* KENEDY-RUNGE 2465434 TO #81 VICTORIA TX (DOE)
    84 —* CEN-CAL 2465443 TO #81 VICTORIA TX (DOE)

    104 -* NORWEST SERVICES INC 1120772 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN ‘DATA PROCESSING SERVICER
    105 -* NORWEST PROPERTIES INC 1120790 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN (DEO)
    106 -* NORWEST AUDIT SERVICES INC 1120839 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN (DOE)
    107 -* NORRWEST INVESTORS INC 1121014 TO #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN (DEO)
    108 –* NORWEST V.C. PARTNERS (1121041 TO #107 MINNEAPOLIS MN (DEO)
    109 -* NORWEST ASIA LTD 1121031 TO #1 HONG KONG HONG KONG (INTERNATIONAL NONBANK SUB OF DOMESTIC ENTITIES)

    DO YOU THINK ITS COINCIDENCE THAT WHILE ‘NORWEST’ IS BLESSED BY HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL NONBANK SUB OF DOMESTIC ENTITIES AND LARGEST NEWLY ACQUIRED AFFILIATE ‘NORWEST ASSET SECURITIES CORP’ JOINT VENTURE WITH GMAC-RFC AND CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE, THAT COINDICENTLY COINCIDENTLY COINCIDENTLY

    OCC APPROVED FIRST US TRADE BANK
    FORMER AMERICAN BANK
    WELLS FARGO BANK COMPANY IN 1996

    WHO COINCIDENTLY COINCIDENTLY COINCIDENTLY
    MERGERS WITH NORWEST CORP WHOSE ‘UNIQUE BUSINESS MODEL’ PROVIDES INCOME TO WELLS FARGO & CO. OWNERS WHETHER BULL MARKET OR BEAR MARKET

    BULL – ORIGIANTION
    BEAR – SERVICING

    AND COINCIDENTLY JUNE 1998 WELLS FARGO BANK COMPANY ANNOUNCES THEY DON’T DO RESIDENTIAL THEIR OWNERS FROWN ON RESIDENTIAL.

    11/2/1998 ‘MARRIAGE’ OF WELLS FARGO & NORWEST CORP – BOTH SURVIVE AND LARGEST PRODUCER OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCTS CONJOINED WITH FIRST US TRADE BANK.

    BY 2000, MICROSOFT, FREDDIE MAC, CHASE, GMAC, NORWEST-WELLS FARGO CONTROLLED REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY.

  2. You all have the evidence you need to bring into the courtroom the owner of the mortgage note. Why do you ignore this valuable evidence?

    The owner of the mortgage note closed with the ‘seller’ of the loan. 2 10 digit numbers one for the ‘seller’ fo the loan, one for the purchaser of the loan.

    The purchaser co Institutional Trustee Underwriter pays the ‘temporary lender’ moving cash deposit thru pass thru agency who does not have to record under bank secrecy act 90 day or less transactions any money made will be reported inside the entity who made money.

    For 90 days the loan is performing and included in the ‘fwp’ and the PSA closes.

    When the PSA closes, the roles and responsiblities change. The loans are inside of portfolios and servicers and subservicers will collect money on the loan# which is a receivable asset of a promissory note, agreements must be good for one year in order that the accounting can be an asset 12 months or under, the receivables are recorded as assets….

    They fooled everyone including President Obama. Why is he protecting the banks.

    Why are you letting them get away with harming your family and nation and not securing evidence?

  3. COURT OF APPEALS
    State of Washington
    DIVISION II

    Case No. 342963-8-II Nperce Co. No. 04-2-08541-7
    T.D. ESCROW SERVICES, INC. d/b/a T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, a Washington Corporation, T.D. SERVICE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation,
    U.S. BANCORP, f/k/a FIRSTAR BANK, NA, a Washington Corporation,
    State of Washington

    Notes from 6/27/2005 County Clerk Office Pierce County Washington
    Discussion on Deed of Trust

    In 1998, The Legislature Mandated That Delivery and Recording Are Necessary For Completion of Sale.

    In 1998, the Legislature amended the statute and clarified these
    ambiguities concerning finality of sale and transfer of deed:
    When delivered to the purchaser, the trustee’s deed shall convey all of the right, title, and interest in the real and personal property sold at the trustee’s sale which the grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of the execution of the deed of trust, and such as the grantor may have thereafter acquired. If the trustee accepts a bid, then the trustee’s sale is final as of the date and time of such acceptance ifthe trustee’s deed is recorded withinmeen days thereafter. After a trustee’s sale, no person shall have any right, by statute or otherwise, to redeem the property sold at the trustee’s sale. (Emphasis supplied).

    The deed of trust is a three-party real property security device involving the debtor (or ‘grantor’), the lender (or ‘beneficiary’), and the trustee.

    Upon default by the grantor, the beneficiary may either foreclose the deed of trust judicially, as a mortgage, or direct the trustee to commence the non-judicial foreclosure process.

    Prior to initiating foreclosure, the act requires that a default has
    occurred and that no action is pending to enforce an obligation secured by the deed of trust.

    Only then, after giving 30 days notice and an opportunity to cure, may the trustee begin the foreclosure proceedings

    The trustee of a deed of trust occupies the most important role in the non- judicial proceedings. The trustee assumes a role of fiduciary for both the mortgagee and the mortgago

  4. Ian,

    No one is suggesting “going down any rabit hole” which means following someone else’s path they expect you to; to your own demise.

    The idea is to promote creative thought and ideas to come up with a direction and solutions to make these judges aware and more importantly ACCOUNTABLE for their rulings.

    There is no case law for that reason…you’re asking for something that doesn’t exist. To date, there have been NO full-blown trials on any of these cases to set any stare decisis…only persuasive law which judges routinely ignore. They have nothing to lose, typically have their pensions tied up in mortgage bonds among other “assets” and simply do NOT want to be the ones making case law and generally refuse to do so. There are exceptions and some occasional good rulings but not compared to the opposite.

    How many of these crooks have gone to jail yet? How do you spell N-O-N-E!!!!

    Indeed, applicable laws against what these guys have done have been on the books in virtually all States for a very long time…FRAUD IS AGAINST THE LAW EVERYWHERE!!! So where the hell are the convictions?!?!?

    Rember the Hunt Brothers – of the Silver inflation and collapse fame; Bernie Madoff; Charles Ponzi…these guys were amateurs compared to those that have perpetrated THIS fraud…

    Getting down to brass tacks does NOT mean the discontinuance of “bitching and moaning” because until enough people get “MAD AS HELL AND [START] NOT TAKING THIS ANY MORE” nothing will get done. So again Ian like my comments with tnharry, a dose of reality is good once in a while and I often offer up the same myself; so far, it hasn’t produced the results we need and the banksters are still winning at least 95-97% of the time as a result.

    While I employ…”don’t get mad, get even”…some times it just doesn’t work well that way and so far, that’s my opinion such as it is…

  5. With all due respect tnharry, you have no idea what I do or do not have and where my suggestions otherwise have their basis.

    While I agree there is no reason to believe the portal is anything more than it appears on its face to be, my suggestions have little to do with the portal, your conclusion of conjecture and misinformation is misplaced evidently on your own bias.

    The fact is, servicers have been foreclosing illegally on homeowners for years now and getting away with it with the blessings of the (speaking of biased) courts. Until the judges and courts face the music either by some form if impeachment; indictment or by being engrossed in the quagmire of these fraudulent actions like the rest of us, they will continue to make bad, biased rulings (although admittedly, usually based on bad lawyering or the limited skills, capabilities and resources availble to pro pers) and fail, or better stated – refuse to see these fraudulent actions for what they, are and hold the perpetrators accountable.

    While I don’t necessarily condone fighting fraudulent actions with fraudulent actions…so far, attempts to fight the banksters at their game have reasonably failed, although there are a lot more “successes” than are commonly known and there is an increasing exposure and main stream understanding of what went on…and the lawsuits against them and general awareness of what went on has increased many fold; the “golden rule” still prevails (“those with the gold make the rules”) and until either some drastic actions are unertaken to stop and reverse these fraudulent actions of those doing nothing less than destroying our Country from within (and without) in these actions, the evisceration of land title rights in exisence for hundreds of years will continue to be annhilated probably irreversably.

    Until fraus omnia vitiate as well stated by Joan in another posting is embraced (fraud vitiates everything it touches)…the damage to property rights continues.

    Attempts at doses of reality, even if well meaning like your previous postings, do nothing to fuel creative thught and pursuits to stop these guys. Jumping to conclusions without any basis in fact merely tempers any “out of the box” pursuit and tempers any ability to come up with potential solutions that might start us down a path to reclaim the sanity and rule of law once embraced in this Country.

  6. tnharry- I’m with you in that regard. No sense heading down another rabbit hole. What we need is more (recent) case law etc. addressing what is and what isn’t working. Johngault’s posts of Texas and Nevada code regarding AOMs, sales, etc. are dynamite-apparently these laws have been on the books for so long everyone has forgotten about them. But there they are. Everyone on this site has to put aside the bitching and moaning and get down to brass tacks.

  7. i’m not sticking up for the enemy – i’m trying to bring this back around to rational thought. we went way down a rabbit hole with nothing but anger and misinformation as the basis

  8. Wow, tn—way to stick up for the enemy!

  9. charles, all you have is rumor built on conjecture based on misinformation wrapped in bias. no reason in the world to think that this is anything other than a portal for a client to transmit info to a vendor.

  10. You don’t need the form to file a NOD as has been shown in many a foreclosure. Proof…they never need any stinking proof…why should anyone else need any proof? Let me see…DOCX GETNET Document Recovery will provide any documents you need very cheaply…want a price sheet, send me an email.

  11. the whole premise of the first commenter Charles is flawed in that it assumes filling out the form will result in a NOD being filed and a foreclosure initiated. then the ensuing vitriol began…

    it’s nothing more than a fillable form on this company’s site used for their customers to transmit information. there is absolutely no reason to believe absent further proof that filling the form by itself will actually initiate anything

  12. ” might be interesting if some of these ca judges faced the ”
    nod sot ts ud & writ of possession…
    hahaha my thought exactly . staaaaart filing!

  13. the LOGS information isn’t exactly earthbreaking. LOGS is an acronym for Law Office of Gerry Shapiro. He’s established partnerships of networked attys across the nation

  14. Carie
    In California, OR, WA, CO (non judicial states) place an Automatic Stay one must file Bankruptcy “BK” which stops notice of defaults?
    sadly allowing substitute trustee to act as robo-mill and includes bank attorneys who don’t have to reveal ‘security’ the mortgage note as collateral attached.

    ‘substitute’ trustees file falsified documents as does the documented LPS/DOCX employees, just the employee may be a contractor such as Aztec Foreclosure Corp.

    The falsified documents as required by the BK courts excludes the same transactions in judicial states just the ‘Trustee’ and Substitute Trustee don’t have to disclose the ‘name of the loan trust, trust fund, certificates, the ‘mortgage note’ as collateral attached inside and sliced and diced when sold to FREDDIE MAC and others Institutional Investors.

    You are forced to fight harder under COTA and Accounting GAAP to reveal what is not recorded with county recorder. You are forced to fight pro pe and when 90 days in default of any amount, the SERVICER of the asset as a receivable – advances funds and tracks the debt they will claim when they liquidate your mortgage.
    You are fighting with the ‘Servicer’ who has to advance funding to the ‘Master Servicer’ get it! The party before BK does not have legal standing and the CA Courts ignore? WHY?

    Aztec Foreclosure Corp

    Aztec Foreclosure Corporation is a full service foreclosure trustee concentrating its practice in the representation of mortgage lenders and other financial institutions in foreclosure of residential real estate collateral in the States of California and Nevada.

    Aztec Foreclosure Corporation of Washington is a full service foreclosure trustee serving the State of Washington.

    Who is Robbie Weaver Office Manager in CA and Elaine Malone Foreclosure Supervisor? Who is the ‘attorney’ providign due dilligence? Kelly D. Sutherland ‘Managing Attorney’ in state of Washington? Is she licensed to practice in CA?

    Look at the 21 Pages of Completed RESALES of Properties!
    Please take NOTICE that
    THe ‘LIST’ 21 pages of sales REPORT generated by data extracted from databases in which somebody programmed the appearance of the data in a report form all CREATED BY A COMPUTER

    A LIST OF ‘COMPUTER GENERATED SALES’ ALL PURCHASED AT THE ‘OPENING BID’ WERE THE HIGHEST BID’
    WHO WAS AT THE SALE? WHAT ‘TRUSTEE’ SIGNED C/O …. generated 8/12/2011 @ 3:00:50 PM

    Report Date 8/12/2011 (Note the report is generated bya computer from database) organized by Case#, Sale Date, Property Address, Bids in which then the ‘security’ identified. Get that information while you are in BK!

    http :// www . aztectrustee . com / Reports / CAZ_WebCompSalesRpt . pdf

    Aztec Foreclosure Corporation | Professional Foreclosure Trustee Serving California and Nevada

    Aztec Foreclosure Corporation of Washington (Washington State only)

    Aztec Foreclosure Corporation has the necessary experience working with lenders to protect their delinquent mortgage assets. Our tenured staff has assisted lenders in their default management department, providing unique insight and an ability to better communicate with our clients. Our knowledge and experience extends beyond the routine foreclosure process into the daily operations of the default management industry. Aztec Foreclosure Corporation of Washington provides the same services in the State of Washington.

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
    Notice of Default – State of California
    Upon receipt of the foreclosure referral package, the Notice of Default (“NOD”) is prepared and forwarded to the title company for recording along with the executed Declaration from the lender. Recoding of the NOD constitutes ‘first legal’ when recorded. Once recorded, a copy of the NOD and Declaration will be mailed to all parties to the Deed of Trust and parties having recorded a request for notice.

    A Trustee Sale Guarantee (“TSG”) will be ordered from the title company and reviewed upon receipt that will disclose all parties entitled to notice, as well as any other encumbrances recorded against the Deed of Trust and reviewed for any possible defects which may exist that would prevent continuation of foreclosure. The one-month mailing notices are sent to any parties requiring notice.

    Notice of Sale
    A Notice of Sale (NOTS) will be recorded in the appropriate county and all parties requiring notice will be sent certified and regular mailings of the upcoming foreclosure sale date. The NOTS will be published for three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation for the city and county the property is located. A copy of the NOTS will be posted on the property itself and recorded in the county recorder’s office. The sale will be conducted at the time and place set forth on the NOTS.

    Bidding instructions will be requested from the client and should be submitted to our office no later than 5 days before the scheduled sale date. Aztec will bid according to the client’s instructions. If there are no competitive bidders, the interest of the property will revert to the beneficiary. Third party bidders must outbid the beneficiary to obtain the property, and the sale proceeds are distributed in the order of priority, with the beneficiary being satisfied first.

    The sale may be postponed pursuant to the client’s instructions without an additional publication. The sale may be postponed up to a maximum of 365 days after the original sale date. After that a new publication will have to be set with a new sale date, mailings, etc.

    Redemption
    There is a 3 month redemption period that must run from when the NOD is recorded before a foreclosure sale can be set. Effective June, 2009, CA implemented the CA Foreclosure Prevention Act which required an additional 90 days of redemption:

    On February 20, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed ABX2 7 and SBX2 7, which establish the California Foreclosure Prevention Act. The California Foreclosure Prevention Act modifies the foreclosure process to provide additional time for borrowers to work out loan modifications while providing an exemption for mortgage loan servicers that have implemented a comprehensive loan modification program. Civil Code Section 2923.52 requires an additional 90 day period beyond the period already provided before a Notice of Sale can be given in order to allow all parties to pursue a loan modification to prevent foreclosure of loans meeting certain criteria identified in that section.

    A mortgage loan servicer who has implemented a comprehensive loan modification program may file an application for exemption from the provisions of Civil Code Section 2923.52. Approval of this application provides the mortgage loan servicer an exemption from the additional 90-day period before filing the Notice of Sale when foreclosing on real property as designated by this Section.

    Upon expiration of redemption, sale, publication and posting dates will be set. The sale cannot be held until the expiration of 21 days from redemption.

    Sale
    The sale will be conducted at the time and place set forth on the NOTS. Aztec will bid according to the client’s instructions. If there are no competitive bidders, the interest of the property will revert to the beneficiary. Third party bidders must outbid the beneficiary to obtain the property, and the sale proceeds are distributed in the order of priority, with the beneficiary being satisfied first.

    The sale may be postponed pursuant to the client’s instructions without an additional publication. The sale may be postponed up to three times at the request of the beneficiary, after which it will be necessary to republish a new sale date.

    Conveyance & Final Title
    After the foreclosure sale is conducted, a Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale is issued by Aztec conveying title to the successful bidder. If the property reverts to the beneficiary, it is sent for recording within a few days of the sale. If a third-party purchases the property, the unrecorded Trustee’s Deed will be sent to the address specified by that party.

    If the property is to be conveyed to the Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (“HUD”) or Secretary of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), a Grant Deed from the beneficiary to the agency is sent to the client for execution prior to the sale.

    After receipt of the Grant Deed, if it is a VA loan, the deed is sent for recording immediately. Aztec will order a title policy and forward it to VA within their required time line. If it is a HUD loan, Aztec will await instructions to record the deed to HUD. Prior to the deed recording, Aztec will obtain tax and lien information to verify if title is clear before recording the HUD deed. When all taxes and liens are cleared, with the client’s instructions, the deed is recorded. Once recorded, the title policy is obtained and forwarded to HUD within their required time line. The clients are given copies of the title polices and recorded deeds.

    The only post-sale right of redemption occurs when an IRS tax lien is recorded against the property. Once the sale is held, the lien is extinguished, but the IRS retains a 120-day right of redemption. During this time frame, the IRS has the right to purchase the property.

    Reinstatement and Payoff
    The trustors, owners and junior lienholders have a statutory right to reinstate the loan up to five business days prior to the sale. The beneficiary may waive the five-day limit and accept reinstatement at any time prior to the sale. Reinstatement must be tendered in the amount of all sums due the lender plus all foreclosure fees, costs and any attorney’s fees and costs incurred.

    Deficiency Judgment – State of California
    The right to a deficiency judgment following the foreclosure sale is limited by anti-deficiency legislation. Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 508b, there can be no deficiency judgment on foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage or trust deed. Also, under Section 580d, one cannot seek a deficiency after a non-judicial foreclosure sale.

    The anti-deficiency rule does make a distinction between vendors and third-party lenders. The vendor is precluded from seeking a deficiency judgment where his loan secures payment of the balance of the purchase price of real property. In respect to a third-party lender, the anti-deficiency rule applies only to a dwelling of not more than four families given to secure repayment of a loan that was used to pay all or part of the purchase price of such dwelling occupied entirely or in part by the purchaser.

    Deficiency judgments may be obtained if the obligation is not subject to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 580. These cases are outside the scope of this synopsis.

    Eviction – State of California
    The eviction process is initiated by serving the owners/trustors with a three-day Notice to Quit. All other occupants must be given a sixty-day Notice to Quit.
    After the 3/60 day period has expired and if the property is still occupied, a Complaint for Unlawful Detainer is filed. The summons and complaint are sent for service upon all defendants. The requisite personal or substitute service of process may take up to two weeks. In cases where service cannot be effectuated, application is made to the court for permission to serve by posting and mailing the summons and complaint to the property.

    Defendants have five days to answer the complaint after service, plus ten extra days if service was made by substitute service or posting and mailing. If the defendants do not respond timely, a default judgment is entered. If defendants file an answer and contest the action, a motion for summary judgment is filed and usually granted within two weeks. In those infrequent cases in which summary judgment is not granted, a trial date is requested. A judgment and writ for possession are submitted to the court within 48 hours of a trial, granting a motion for summary judgment or a default judgment is entered. The court is requested to forward the writ to the marshals for posting on the property. Processing of the writ and posting take approximately two weeks.

    The defendants have five days to vacate after posting of the writ. The marshal then returns to the property to physically remove the occupants. The servicer must arrange to have a representative present to take possession and secure the property. The majority of eviction cases that are former owner occupied are completed within 60 to 75 days.

    SEE AZTEC FORECLOSURE ‘TRUSTEE’

    SAME DETAILS ABOVE FOR NEVADA,
    AND SAME DETAILs ABOVE FOR ‘WASHINGTON STATE ONLY’

    Washington Staff:

    Kelly D. Sutherland
    Managing Attorney
    360.260.2253 ext 281
    ksutherland@logs.com

  15. In 2006, Old FIS merged into one of our wholly owned subsidiaries;
    shares of Old FIS common stock were converted into the right to receive shares of our common stock;

    FIS changed our name from “Certegy Inc.” to “Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.”, and changed our New York Stock Exchange trading symbol from “CEY” to “FIS”; and

    “$3.8 trillion, and over 235 million deposit accounts and non-mortgage consumer loans and leases are processed on our core bank processing platform. We also provide customized business process outsourcing related to aspects of the origination and management of mortgage …”

    “Additionally, we currently are engaged in significant efforts to upgrade two of our most important applications: our core bank processing software and our mortgage processing software. These applications were acquired upon our acquisition of FI from Alltel Information Services, Inc. in 2003. We spent the period immediately following the acquisition discussing with key customers the changes that they would like to see made in those products. In 2004, we began the development work to implement changes required to keep pace with the marketplace and the requirements of our customers. Including amounts already spent, we expect to spend approximately $60.0 million on the development of our mortgage servicing platform”

  16. carie,

    If you’ll take a close look at the infamous LOGS Network (http://www.logs.com/contact_us/logs_network.pdf). You will find that Aztec Foreclosure Corp of WA is the same pond scum as the nefarious characters as Shapiro & Sutherland of OR. Google Kelly Sutherland, Shapiro & Fishman, and/or Gerlad R Shapiro to stock your war chest with information.

    “Do not fear your enemies. The worst they can do is kill you. Do not fear friends. At worst, they may betray you. Fear those who do not care; they neither kill nor betray, but betrayal and murder exists because of their silent consent.”

    Love your posts … keep up the fight.

  17. 2/6/06

    • Old FIS merged into one of our wholly owned subsidiaries;

    • the shares of Old FIS common stock were converted into the right to receive shares of our common stock;

    • we changed our name from “Certegy Inc.” to “Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.”, and changed our New York Stock Exchange trading symbol from “CEY” to “FIS”; and

    “$3.8 trillion, and over 235 million deposit accounts and non-mortgage consumer loans and leases are processed on our core bank processing platform. We also provide customized business process outsourcing related to aspects of the origination and management of mortgage …”

    “Additionally, we currently are engaged in significant efforts to upgrade two of our most important applications: our core bank processing software and our mortgage processing software. These applications were acquired upon our acquisition of FI from Alltel Information Services, Inc. in 2003. We spent the period immediately following the acquisition discussing with key customers the changes that they would like to see made in those products. In 2004, we began the development work to implement changes required to keep pace with the marketplace and the requirements of our customers. Including amounts already spent, we expect to spend approximately $60.0 million on the development of our mortgage servicing platform

  18. Mess started in 1995/1996

    BUSINESS PURPOSE OF ‘MERS’
    TRACK ‘MORTGAGE NOTES’ COLLATERAL RESOLD TO INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, WHO TRADED THE SERVICING RIGHTS TO THIRD PARTYS.

    1996-FREDDIE MAC INVESTOR, AND CHASE ‘SERVICER’ AND ‘LENDER’ moved forward

    All of the COTA’s Chain of title report or ‘Clouded Title Report’ I like to call them, reveal that the titles are clouded by the sale and purchase of third parties not recorded with the public offices, of your county, the County clerk or County recorder. When in default, an eAssignment will be recorded and eNotes recorded and eAllonges recorded claiming the TRUSTEE assigned a substitute to go to court and take property.

    Dawn,
    you have a title which is clouded and legally should not be insured under an OWNERS POLICY when the property is to be sold. You need a chain of title audit by an expert not part of the nationwide network who hides the defects recorded inside private vendors databases.

    Your collateral as a mortgage note was purchased from “TRUSTEE” of Issuing Entity by Institutional investor FREDDIE MAC in a series of acquistions, trades, fundings, escrow.

  19. MERS ‘eNotes’ in eVaults location of Sales Agreements purchased tracked inside ‘MERS” National Registry. The eNotes created by LPS/DOCX, TDServices, FIS, …..

    https://livinglies.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/all-about-mers-in-footnotes-to-senate-testimony/

  20. Carie,

    I would contend that “deregulation” was not as much the problem…in fact, they NEVER deregulated FRAUD!!! In my opinion what they did was not so much deregulation as reregulation giving fraud the green light and the resulting lack of prosecution wreaks of collusion and conspiracy along with a whole host of other felonies no one’s been brought up on carges for (yet). The law continues to seem to be further split in equalty from the “some are more equal than other” to the extent that our Country is being destroyed from within (and without) in a way previous world and other wars were unsucessful. Until more understand and are willing to do something about the evisceration of our rights that our forefathers faught and died for, we will continue down this road until our Country has little resemblance to what we once knew.

  21. Congress allowed institutional investors like FREDDIE MAC and The US TRUST Corp, and Chase Manhattan Corp and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp, 1995/1996 takings in bad faith, intent MERS, to track sale and purchase of ‘mortgage notes’ separated from Deeds of Trust. No turning back, former President Clinton must have been told if he did not sign HR Bill allowing new classification ‘Financial Holding Companies’ though the Financial Modernization Act, the existing ‘mess’ would be ‘his’ fault perhaps? The book he needs to write, former President Clinton, who were your advisors? Now that’s a noon-fiction story we all would like to read about. Perhaps former President Clinton you could make available the profits you certainly are not in need of and make available to the ‘homeless’ American’s who voted for you.
    Performing ‘mortgage notes’ are purchased and are residential mortgage notes when purchased become collateral and assets of Institutional investors.
    The sales and purchases collateral related to the DEED OF TRUST recorded in the public domain affixed to the National eNote Registry tracking transactions and/or the UCD File ID Uniform Collateral Document (appraisal and loan information) FREDDIE as INVESTOR and Fannie as LENDER do business.
    Clearly, FREDDIE Institutional Investor and FANNIE allowed collateral and loans to become bifurcated originally separating ‘note’ from ‘deed of trust’ and tracked transactions clouding the TITLE (Deed of Trust) tracking the unsecured liens inside of the eNote national registry called ‘MERS’.
    What is NOT recorded with the county clerks and county recorders clearly recorded in anyone of the databases in which GSE’s must document collateral in the UAD File Doc ID, and collectively these transactions harmed the economy.
    No turning back the clock? We thought Midnight Y2K would be the weapon of mass destruction. No the preparation to engage over the CLOUD United States business in the Finance Universe, the ‘real estate’ of the UNITED STATES as COLLATERAL! IS a huge story yet to be told another non-fiction chapter of former President Clinton’s book. You were there former President Clinton when they (the FEDERAL RESERVE, and its Page the OCC, took control of the ECONOMY and US TREASURY 1996-2000).
    Consumers thought they were safe trusting the Government Regulatory Agencies who said we were safe and the FTC allowed the ‘banks in 2000 to promote BRAND NAME of banks affixed to general purpose business entities and extraordinary powers vested to conglomerates by CONGRESS who attended the new session when the clock struck midnight Y2K and people cheered yeah the financial world did not end. The chapters where the CEO’s, CIO’s, CFO’s of the related ‘smartest guys in the room beaming instant billionaires’ did they expect the damage sooner? The 5-year swaps was the game plan by 2003.
    Pretender ‘LENDERS’ mortgage brokers takings possession of property with intent to allow undisclosed third party to take possession in larcenous manner has been proven now what?
    No one is safe whether current paying their ‘mortgage’ for while you are living the American dream which the Amendments state lawful residents entitled to be safe in life and property and living in pursuit of happiness ‘commerce’ only possible if CONGRESS (both HOUSES) protect the welfare of the nation which includes the states and its residents, allows laws to be enforced protecting consumers who remain unsafe.
    1995/1996 FREDDIE MAC Institutional Investor & US Trust Corp’s Chase Manhattan Corp, and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp , ALTA insures ‘collateral’ mortgage notes, already bifurcated 1995 forward.
    Consumers did not need to know.

    Documents not recorded with County Clerk and County Recorder, specific transactions not recorded in the public domain are recorded for the benefit of the INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, OWNERS FREDDIE MAC, Chase, acted in bad faith controlling side their private domain business conducted over the CLOUD, commerce inside finance universe which FCC regulates and licenses to Microsoft channels in which FREDDIE, Microsoft, Chase, … took control of real estate industry. So what are you going to do about this?

    ‘the CLOUD’ 1995 forward the sale and purchase of ‘mortgage notes’ as collateral were sold and purchased, slicing and dicing ‘mortgage notes’ from ‘deed of trusts’ requiring nationwide network one what could continue to insure OWNERS TITLE POLICIES and not reveal the defects!
    Who is collecting the money for the institutional investor? ‘Master Servicer’ c/o TRUSTEE responsible for paying the Institutional Investors and Certificate Holders FILE DOC ID of ‘Uniform Collateral Document’ more important than the MIN# recording on the RETAIL SIDE the ‘SALES Agreement 10 Digit Number’ and the MERS MEMBER ID 7 digit prefix.
    1995-1999 mortgage note as collateral resold many times placed inside different financial products sold over financial exchanges. By 3/13/2000, Chase, Wells Fargo & Co, BOA, became financial holding companies in control now ‘lawfully?’ of the funds as a financial holding company allowed to mix Insurance, Securities, Banking, and General Purpose Business entities business.
    The pass through agency of the ‘Issuing Entity’ c/o Registrant’s corporate trust services as depositor handled monies in and monies out and controlled reinsurance the clouded titles of residential real estate controlling the real estate industry nationwide.

  22. Boy, they covered everything didn’t they? Makes perfect sense…we need the judges to wake up…I like your idea, Charles…makes me think—how can I go after “Aztec Foreclosure Corp” who illegally filed a NOD on me??? Nobody checks ANYTHING. Lawlessness. That’s how we got in this mess to begin with…DEREGULATION and the SOCIOPATHIC MATERIALISTS went CRAZY…and America is DYING because of it.

  23. Neil, we need to track all the great evidence already documented by my hero Lynn S. and identify the ‘handlesr’ TD Services, LPS, MERS, FIS, SERVICE-Link, CTS-LINk, as related to the transactions what a powerful spring map!

  24. Purpose of form in public domain wil be to blame robo-signers like they did with LPS/DOCX. Trustee on his own will acted in bad faith? But who hired him/her? to falsify documents, with intent of filing documents with public offices County Clerks and County Recorders and COURTS! Hello where is the FCC and FBI? They must be on the case.

  25. Seems to work when I tried. Looks to me like ANYONE could initiate a foreclosure on ANYONE…might be interesting if some of these judges faced the foreclosure mills like the rest of us….see: http://www.tdsf.com/ and click on “Initiate a Foreclosure”…appears to me there is little to no restrictions on the ability to foreclose on someone…very tempting…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,119 other followers

%d bloggers like this: