Job Opening at Wells Fargo

on Linked in

Editor’s note: Interesting that they are looking for people to prepare “Default Assignments.” A good question to pose to the robo-witness in court. There is lots of good reasons to ask questions of the robo-witness who will have no information knowledge as to the answer or even an understanding of the question. Items in bold or italic are my emphasis supplied.

Job description

** Please note the posting duration may be shortened based on job seeker volume **

SHIFT AVAILABLE: The hours will tentatively be 7am-3:30pm.
Shifts are subject to change based on business needs.

The Default Assignment team is responsible for the creation, execution, and recordation of assignments in preparation of loans moving into foreclosure. This position being filled is primarily responsible for the review and execution of default assignment that are being prepared proactively. (e.s.)

Review includes: confirmation that the proper chain of title has been documented, the assignment created by the Document Preparer has been created accurately, and the assignment is in the proper name to proceed with foreclosure.

The document execution responsibility includes signing default assignments after theyve successfully passed the review steps. This position works very closely with the Document Preparation team and provides them with feedback on assignment document preparation. (e.s.)

This position requires the applicant to qualify to be a Wells Fargo officer to execute documents and the ability to pass an online MERS signing authority assessment. Assignments being executed will be for both Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo as POA, and/or MERS.

Responsibilities may also include:

– Procurement and correction of complex documents used in perfecting a mortgage lien.
– Analyze, interpret and document information from various sources: including multiple online systems.
– Resolve complex customer issues using multiple resources and records; editing and or correcting specialized and/or complex documents.
– Research and resolve document questions and issues as identified by external and internal business partners.
– Track and monitor inventory on an ongoing basis for compliance and reconcile discrepancies.
– Act as a liaison between various internal groups such Sales, Fulfillment and Servicing and external partners such as attorneys, settlement companies, investors and housing authorities.
This position may require communication via multiple sources (fax, phone, email and formal letter) with internal and external business partners.
Successful candidate should demonstrate skill in influencing and negotiating timelines; gaining commitment and overcoming objections with the internal and external business partners.
Successful candidate should demonstrate skill at recognizing trends and be able to make procurement decisions based on information provided and communicate procurement steps via written and verbal communication.
– Analyze issues, business requirements, standards, procedures and deficiency trends to identify opportunities for improvement provide statistical performance data/conclusions to management for use in making business decisions.
– Update tracking systems as necessary to ensure accurate procurement activities are captured and reported on.
– Act as a mentor and training resource for newer or junior staff.
– Act as a point of escalation in dealing with procurement issues that are difficult to resolve.
– Assess individual inventory for bulk procurement opportunities and provide solutions for increasing individual and department productivity.

Basic Qualifications: 6+ months experience in customer service, loan administration, collections, or sales environment.

Minimum Qualifications: – High School diploma.
– 6+ months experience within the Mortgage/Banking/Finance and/or Real Estate industry.
– Strong computer skills (including Excel and Word).
– Strong attention to detail and ability to identify trends.
– Proven time management and strong organizational skills.
– Strong written and verbal communication skills.
– Ability to assimilate change.
– Demonstrate flexibility in a dynamic work environment.

Preferred Skills: – 12+ months experience within the Mortgage/Banking/Finance and/or Real Estate industry.
Previous experience with Arrow, Loan DQ, Fidelity/CPI/LPS/LIS/MSP, and/or File Net/LIV.
– Previous mortgage experience particularly in the areas of Customer Service, Lien Release, Default or Collections.
– Previous Final Docs experience.

Wells Fargo is an Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D/V.
© 2012 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. All rights reserved

31 Responses

  1. You can’t be both HOLDER or HOLDER IN DUE COURSE & be the instrument itself otherwise you rob banks.

  2. It sure fits the profile of PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING when FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT gets BAILED OUT by its own unsubstantiated subjectiveness to it.

    How do you get subjected to something unproven?

    Omit the facts & enter the omission – FALSIFIED EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS to DELINATE the LACK OF CAPACITY & STANDING TO SUE by the subjogator.

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/family-tradition-lyrics-hank-williams-jr.html

  3. Because HANK PAULSON is the rep for FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT, they can PROCURE nothing of value that would further devalue the valueless because that would incriminate GOLDMAN SACHS to be the main culprit in HANK PAULSONS UNDERPERFORMING IN HOUSE STOCK PORTFOLIO.

  4. Because WALL STREET EXECS bailed themselves out unlawfully by bonding HANK PAULSON to their fraud, he is the HOLDER IN DUE COURSE of their own debt fraud re-issues.

    He belongs to BUNDESBANK most likely because dead heads have no tails in the executor branch of FORCED COMPLIANCE with their own fraud.

    They can have their fun with him trying to force him to re-establish themselves by performing on their own non-performance.

    That’s when WALL STREET CONTRIVANCE will be revealed to be SEX IN THE SALE OF FAKE SECURITIES AKA THE CARRY TRADE by subjective harassers.

  5. They should just say they need skilled bank robbers to forge signatures & steal identities.

    That’s how ORGANIZED CRIME operates:

    http://fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/rusorg4.htm

  6. Ahhh, the “vesting assignment” raises its ugly head once again. CA Apps bounced me out of my case questioning the ‘vesting assignment’ by throwing an argument not raised in trial court about agency allowing for the vestment. I might have had a chance to defend if the App Ct had raised the issue and allowed amended filing, or if they had invited parties to brief the issue since they waited until parties were briefed and notification of oral argument to present the issue.

  7. happy christmas

  8. And that was rule 60( b) NOT 69
    Ill go now

  9. Oh bugger sorry left my contacts out today relying on 1.75,s and thats the truth

  10. True
    Jurisdiction is open to challenge at ANY time
    Study this case law
    Sanchez v. pacific power Co
    ” we ordinarily consider matters on apoeal that ate nit specifically and dustinctly raised and argued in appellants opening brief(citation omitted)That rule does not apply, however when the issue is jurisdictional, see Conforte v. United States 979 F.2d1375, 1377( 9th circuit.1992) (” the questiin was not addressed by the distruct court, but jurisdiction is open to challenge at any time”)
    I cited this case law because the court of apowals failed to address whether the district court was within its jurisdiction not to allow relief under rule 69(b) (6)
    Hope that spurrs others further research may not be pertinent to induvidual cases but since someone mentiined jurisdiction being open to challenge – anyhoo i got kicked out i was pro se which was never ever in a million years by choice. Just so ya know.

  11. Ian, thanks buddy! I post articles at rogerrinaldi.wordpress when you have a minute stop by. Best to you!

  12. Hello everyone,

    If you’ve previously lost a battle like Deb Wynn, a fellow nurse, you are still in the game. Here is some more info I dug up besides the document advertising Wells Fargo’s Default Docs Team Job.

    A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court, Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 ( C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

    Also, A void judgment is one that has been procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud, or entered by court that did not have jurisdiction over subject matter or the parties, Rook v. Rook, 353 S.E. 2d 756, (Va. 1987).

    If you were in bankruptcy when you filed your action against the pretender-lender and you had a judgment rendered against you and in favor of the pretender-lender, then you lacked standing to bring the action in the first place and the court lacked jurisdiction and the judgment is void. That’s what happened to us.

    George Riley
    Automan1500

  13. Aww thank you Ian
    Ive had a set back, lost the battle…not the war.

  14. Deb Wynn- keep posting, you do good research. I answered you first query 5-6-7 years ago. You are a nurse, if I remember correctly. Nurses are the best, more important than MDs. Keep
    Posting. Stir up the masses!! We appreciate your input.

  15. Ukg- keep
    Up the attack, post more often. They are all criminals. Drink some scotch, mull things over, come up w a plan of attack. I like your style, I’ve been reading your posts for 5-6-7 years.
    Carry on.

  16. I think they call it layering- layers of protection , or just layers take that any way you choose.

  17. Fuck Wells Fargo.

    Foreclosure/Priority: bank entitled to relief from judgment where junior lienholder foreclosed on subject property and Court ordered sale of property free and clear of all claims by bank – Bank of America, N.A. v. Kipps Colony II Condominium Assn., Inc., Case Nos. 2D14-858, 2D14-4436 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 9, 2015) (reversed and remanded)
    Foreclosure/Standing: mortgagee not entitled to summary judgment against junior lienholder where junior lienholder’s motion to dismiss challenging standing had not yet been set for hearing – Statewide Homeowners Solutions, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Case No. 4D13-3467 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 9, 2015) (reversed and remanded)
    Foreclosure/Standing: bank not entitled to summary judgment where genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether note had been endorsed prior to filing complaint –Morris v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. as Trustee for HIS Asset Securitization Corp. Trust 2006-HE1, Case No. 4D13-4049 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 9, 2015) (reversed and remanded)
    Foreclosure/Standing: bank not entitled to final judgment of foreclosure where bank’s expert admitted he had no idea when allonge endorsements were created or affixed to the note – Hepworth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 4D13-4056 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 9, 2015) (reversed and remanded)
    Foreclosure/Oral Modification: borrower not entitled to judgment based upon alleged oral modification to mortgage, as any modification would have been subject to Statute of Frauds – Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Delvar, Case No. 4D14-763 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 9, 2015)
    Foreclosure/Issues of Fact: mortgage servicer not entitled to summary judgment, as genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Fannie Mae owned note at time of complaint and whether certain payments made by borrower were properly credited to account – Gomes v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., Case No. 5D14-1668 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 11, 2015) (reversed)
    Foreclosure: testimony of amounts due under mortgage foreclosed was inadmissible hearsay because witness’s testimony based on amounts in draft judgment, which was not a business record admitted into evidence – McMillan v The Bank of NY Mellon, Trustee, Case No. 4D14-514 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 2, 2015) (affirmed in part, reversed in part).
    Claim of Lien: HOA’s claim of lien for past due assessments does not relate back to filing of declaration absent specific relation-back language in declaration – U.S. Bank NA, Trustee v Grant, et al., Case No. 4D14-979 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 2, 2015) (reversed and remanded).
    Jurisdiction: trial court had jurisdiction under Rule 1.540(b)(1) to set aside notice of voluntary dismissal filed by inadvertence or mistake – JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v Kehle, Case No. 4D14-1631 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 2, 2015) (reversed and remanded)
    Substitute Service: process server complied with substitute service statute requiring he “inform the person of their contents” by advising defendant’s husband he was serving a summons and complaint that needed to be responded to within twenty days – Mauro and Quinn v Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Case No. 4D14-1993 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 2, 2015) (affirmed)
    Standing: subsequent owner of mortgage failed to prove standing to foreclose mortgage because testimony at trial not based on personal knowledge and no business records reflecting how or when mortgage was assigned entered into evidence – Gonzalez v BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al., Case No. 5D14-3678 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 4, 2015) (reversed)
    Automatic Stay: foreclosure action properly dismissed when filed after borrower filed bankruptcy petition and automatic stay was in effect – Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. v Worobec, et al., Case No. 5D14-4022 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 4, 2015) (affirmed)
    Standing: trial court erred by denying borrower’s motion for involuntary dismissal because lender failed to present documents and other competent evidence necessary to reestablish lost note, prove its standing to foreclose, prove amount owed on note, and did not prove compliance with condition precedent listed in paragraph 22 of mortgage -Figueroa v FNMA, et al., Case No. 5D14-4078 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 4, 2015) (reversed and remanded)

  18. lol.

    Reckon they breezed that one past counsel?

    Make it a Great Day.

  19. They should simplify the ad and just say “crooks wanted” for document fabrication, ex cons welcome to apply!

  20. If One is not sending a letter of rescission and making sure the CFPB knows of your fight, I don’t know why One would think their outcome is going to be any different if the same people are doing the same things.

    If One’s home is stolen and they didn’t assert their right to rescind, because they ‘thought’ they were not eligible for it, or did not include the CFPB if there is a bonafide complaint on who is using papers to steal, then why do a what if, later when you would know what it would be by walking that walk.

    If I knew then what I know now, I would not walk the same trail as all the other animals lined up for slaughter. Someone would be looking for me like the lost sheep. All the other sheep are left to the wolves while the shepherd goes looking for the one missing.

    In other words, I’d have done what was different from what everyone else was doing. It’s obvious the collective’s idea of the solution, leads to the same ‘solution’, One without a home, and one who stole it with impunity.

    Just my opinion and observation.
    Trespass Unwanted, Creator, Corporeal, Life, Free, People, Independent, State, In Jure Proprio, Jure Divino

  21. What a joke of a job. Why don’t they just hire parolees
    Fresh out of prison rather than high school. They have a little more experience in criminal business

  22. Sally, in another scenario. ….. What if the homeowners were investors to? Would that not be like using your pension funds to foreclose on yourself?

  23. Hi All,

    I know this is a political and not so” feel good article”, but the reasons we have been praying for my house, is basically because people are stealing homes from innocent people all over the US, making 60 Million homeless, without housing, food, or healthcare, dental care…right here and I keep on trying to figure it out…. like the this poor slob with a vision of doing something really spectacular with his life….(my vision was much the same only much more modest, with a 1844 homestead renovation that has been as baffling)….so please read this, and make the prayers count for the entire situation, because our prayers make a HUGE differenct).

    HBO‘s former CEO and Chairman of the Board,Michael J. Fuchs, invested over $100 million (dollars) in a Big Island Hawaii development that sank like the Titanic with the economy in 2007. The Hawaii scales of justice have not been tipped in Mr. Fuchs’ favor – apparently they haven’t even been balanced.

    His story…..

    https://deadlyclear.wordpress.com/2012/06/15/does-the-judge-in-your-foreclosure-case-own-stock-in-the-bank-foreclosing-on-you/#comment-13601

  24. It is amazing that the Justice Dept now under Atty Gen Lynch and no longer under the heavily conflicted Eric Holder who is back at the firm that represents both Wells & MERS in Covington & Burling. Even as the NYTimes had question this conflict of Interest and the relationship with Mrs. Holder and Mrs. Lynch, there not been a independent review of what Wells has done base on its history. Wells has been caught breaking the law with several tens of thousands of customer and they just been caught breaking the 2012 Housing Settlement, yet the Federal Government failed to react to the Whistle-blower claim and Lynn Szymoniak Feb 2014 Qui Tam law suit.

    It was not just Baltimore but Memphis and 11 others that reached a settlement with the racist at Wells Fargo, but currently we got Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and Oakland that are suing Wells!

  25. When I sent this job posting to Neil I was wondering whether there is an angle here for class certification? Any readers or Neil care to speculate on that? I just cannot wrap my head around a class action because its all based on fraud. Any other spins?

  26. That makes me over qualified . lol
    When I see Fidelity LPS LIS. …
    I ask myself … do they pay by the hour or if they pay only upon completion of the fraud?

    KC makes no money.
    Honesty is the Best Policy

  27. This would be called the Forgery and Fraudulent Document Department. Sad commentary that this is still going on and still allowed to go on.

  28. And they are still at it! Why? They were sued here in Baltimore for targeting minorities and steering them into more profitable loan products for them. The suit was driven by whistle blower Elizabeth Jacobsen. Do you think ANY of that mattered? Not a wit! WF and BofA ATMs and branches are on every corner in Baltimore City and County. Sickens me!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: